Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
A lower court may well not rule against a binding precedent, although it feels that it's unjust; it might only express the hope that a higher court or maybe the legislature will reform the rule in question. In case the court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and needs to evade it and help the regulation evolve, it could both hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts from the cases; some jurisdictions allow to get a judge to recommend that an appeal be carried out.
However, decisions rendered with the Supreme Court of your United States are binding on all federal courts, and on state courts regarding issues in the Constitution and federal regulation.
If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a chance to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only performed In the event the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and the petitioner company responded into the allegations as a result they were nicely aware of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners may well seek remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
one hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were instructed on the boy’s past, they questioned if their children were Harmless with him in their home. The therapist assured them that that they had very little to worry about.
Because of this, merely citing the case is more very likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Consider it as calling someone to inform them you’ve found their lost phone, then telling them you live in these-and-this kind of community, without actually offering them an address. Driving throughout the community seeking to find their phone is likely to get more frustrating than it’s well worth.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, Additionally it is a effectively-set up proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether click here the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives with the police should be to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all, make sure law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair towards the offender and also the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other Courts, However they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
twelve . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair towards the offender as well as Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
Statutory laws are Those people created by legislative bodies, for instance Congress at both the federal and state levels. Even though this kind of regulation strives to form our society, supplying rules and guidelines, it would be impossible for almost any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.
Generally, only an appeal accepted by the court of last vacation resort will resolve this kind of differences and, For a lot of reasons, this kind of appeals are often not granted.
States also generally have courts that deal with only a specific subset of legal matters, like family law and probate. Case law, also known as precedent or common law, is the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending around the relationship between the deciding court and the precedent, case regulation can be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision because of the U.S. Court of Appeals to the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting in California (whether a federal or state court) is just not strictly bound to Stick to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by a single district court in Ny is not binding on another district court, but the first court’s reasoning could help guide the second court in achieving its decision. Decisions with the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more